Su v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Dan Su
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and John Allen
Case Number: 1:2024cv01508
Filed: February 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Natasha C Merle
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2024 Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas (Zito, Nicole)
March 25, 2024 Civil Case Terminated. (AG)
March 1, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole M. Zito on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Zito, Nicole)
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint -- Upon the complaint for writ of mandamus filed February 28, 2024, it is ORDERED that: (1) The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause on or before April 30, 2024, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court; (2) On or before May 30, 2024, Plaintiff shall file their reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of this Court; (3) Service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the complaint, shall be made by the Clerk of this Court via electronic case filing to the United States Attorney. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 3/1/2024. (AG)
February 29, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas. (CV)
February 29, 2024 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV)
February 28, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17616966 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Dan Su. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit) (Chien, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Su v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dan Su
Represented By: David Chien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Nicole M. Zito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Nicole M. Zito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Allen
Represented By: Nicole M. Zito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?