Yang v. Garland et al
| Jiang Yang |
| US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Director of USCIS Ur M. Jaddous, Director Patricia A. Menges and Director Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2024cv01513 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jiang Yang. Merrick B. Garland served on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024; Ur M. Jaddous served on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024; Patricia A. Menges served on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024. (IH) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference will be held by telephone before Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/10/2024 at 12:30 PM. The parties are directed to call (888) 278-0296 and type in the access code 2012636 to join the conference. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 3/4/2024. (SP)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddous, Patricia A. Menges, ale mayorkas. (CV) |
| Filing 2 FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 100012928 (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddous, Patricia A. Menges, ale mayorkas, filed by Jiang Yang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
