Ayman v. Garland et al
Ahnaf Rafid Ayman |
US Attorney General Merrick Garland and Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2024cv01579 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the stipulation of dismissal #7 , the above case caption is hereby closed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/26/2024. (AL) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou (Schumacher, Robert) |
ORDER: Defendants shall provide an update on Plaintiff's immigration application by 4/4/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/14/2024. (AL) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Schumacher, II on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Schumacher, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ahnaf Rafid Ayman. Merrick Garland served on 3/6/2024, answer due 3/27/2024; Ur M. Jaddou served on 3/6/2024, answer due 3/27/2024. (Rahman, Mahfuzur) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou. (CV) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (CV) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17626590 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Ahnaf Rafid Ayman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-130, #4 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-485, #5 Exhibit Current Case Status from USCIS Website) (Rahman, Mahfuzur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.