Jan v. Mayorkas et al
Parwana Jan |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and US Attorney General Merrick Garland |
1:2024cv01686 |
March 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parwana Jan. Merrick Garland served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024; Ur Jaddou served on 3/13/2024, answer due 4/3/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. (Cox, Theodore) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel G. Balaban on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Balaban, Rachel) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (SDM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17641656 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Parwana Jan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Cox, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.