Maddaloni v. The Procter & Gamble Company
| Fortunata Maddaloni |
| The Procter & Gamble Company |
| 1:2024cv01719 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer I. Sheehan on behalf of Fortunata Maddaloni (aty to be noticed) (Sheehan, Spencer) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to The Procter & Gamble Company. (MI) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re Quality Control Check - Summons, by Fortunata Maddaloni (Nam, Sue) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/8/2024) (CV). |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fortunata Maddaloni (Nam, Sue) Modified on 3/8/2024 (CV). |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (CV) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Fortunata Maddaloni (Nam, Sue) Modified on 3/8/2024 (CV). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Procter & Gamble Company Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Fortunata Maddaloni. (Nam, Sue) Modified on 3/8/2024 (CV). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maddaloni v. The Procter & Gamble Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fortunata Maddaloni | |
| Represented By: | Spencer I. Sheehan |
| Represented By: | Sue Jung Nam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
