Su v. Pinnacle Security Patrol Inc. et al
| Julia A. Su |
| Pinnacle Security Patrol Inc. and Olusegun Oloniju |
| 1:2024cv01793 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Matthew M Sullivan is substituted as counsel of record for Plaintiff in place and stead of Attorney Jordan Laris Cohen. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/25/2024. (RO)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Consent to Change Attorney by Matthew M Sullivan (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service cert of service for consent order granting substitution of attorney) (Sullivan, Matthew) Modified on 4/25/2024 to add motion to substitute attorney (RO). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Julia A. Su re #9 Scheduling Order,,,,,, (Cohen, Jordan) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court construes the reply filed at #8 to be an Answer by the individual defendant to the Complaint. The Court vacates its #5 Scheduling Order and will hold an Initial Conference on May 14, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. Counsel with knowledge and authority for all represented parties must attend. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. For any party not represented by counsel, that party must attend. Defendant Olusegun Oloniju may proceed in this case pro se, without a lawyer. However, the corporate Defendant may only appear through licensed counsel. See Rowland v. California Mens Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993).The parties are directed to discuss the attached Proposed Discovery Plan, in advance of the conference. Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing, must notify the opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent to the request. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Plaintiff is directed to send a copy of this Order to defendants and file proof of service by April 12, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/9/2024.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/9/2024. (RO)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER filed by Olusegun Oloniju. (MB) Modified on 4/9/2024 from previously listing as REPLY in to Summons (RO). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julia A. Su. Olusegun Oloniju served on 3/19/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Cohen, Jordan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julia A. Su. Pinnacle Security Patrol Inc. served on 3/19/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Cohen, Jordan) |
|
Filing 5
VACATED ORDER IN FLSA CASE REQUIRING DISCOVERY AND SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION SCHEDULE: The parties are ordered to engage in discovery as outlined in the attached Order, and to engage in early settlement discussions. A joint status report regarding settlement efforts must be filed by September 12, 2024. If the parties are unable to settle on their own, the case will be referred to EDNY Court-Annexed Mediation for formal mediation. The parties may move to waive these requirements and permit the parties to proceed by way of a Proposed Discovery Plan only for good cause, by filing a joint letter request on ECF. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/12/2024. (RO)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Olusegun Oloniju, Pinnacle Security Patrol Inc.. (KD) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No (N/A),, filed by Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons for Pinnacle Security Patrol Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons for Olusegun Oloniju, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A - Employee List) (Cohen, Jordan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
