Wilmington PT Corp. v. Mitra et al
Wilmington PT Corp. |
Ranjit Kumar Mitra, Jacob Milton, Mofazzal Hossain, Mahmuda Begum, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Niru S. Nira and New York City Environmental Control Board |
1:2024cv01830 |
March 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Certificate of Merit Affirmation Pursuant to CPLR 3012-b and Section Nine-X of the Banking Law by Wilmington PT Corp. (Weinreb, Alan) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Wilmington PT Corp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Weinreb, Alan) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wilmington PT Corp. (Weinreb, Alan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mahmuda Begum, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Mofazzal Hossain, Jacob Milton, Ranjit Kumar Mitra, New York City Environmental Control Board, Niru S. Nira filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17659456 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Wilmington PT Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Exhibit G, #2 N.Y. RPAPL 1320 Notice) (Weinreb, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.