Yurov v. Mayorkas et al
Vladyslav Yurov |
Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, US Attorney General Merrick Garland and Christopher A. Wray |
1:2024cv01967 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Rachel P Kovner |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary McGarvey-DePuy on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (McGarvey-DePuy, Mary) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray. (CV) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17677298 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Vladyslav Yurov. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons with Rider) (Sirota, Vladislav) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.