Zhu v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Xiumei Zhu
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Secretary Chad Wolf
Case Number: 1:2024cv01981
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2024 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Chad Wolf (Megaris, Alexandra)
March 28, 2024 Civil Case Terminated. See #6 Stipulation of Dismissal. (KW)
March 22, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandra Megaris on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Megaris, Alexandra)
March 19, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xiumei Zhu. Merrick B. Garland served on 3/19/2024, answer due 5/20/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/19/2024, answer due 5/20/2024; Chad Wolf served on 3/19/2024, answer due 5/20/2024. (Yang, Yongxian)
March 19, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Chad Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD)
March 19, 2024 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
March 19, 2024 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Chad Wolf filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17680228 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Xiumei Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A Plaintiff's Permanent Resident Card, #4 Exhibit B Plaintiffs' I-90 Receipt) (Yang, Yongxian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zhu v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xiumei Zhu
Represented By: Yongxian Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Alexandra Megaris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Alexandra Megaris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary Chad Wolf
Represented By: Alexandra Megaris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?