Al Shemairi v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2024cv02047 |
March 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17688334 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Ahmad Ghalib Al Shemairi. (Cuccia, Edward) |
NOTICE: Missing Civil Cover The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover SheetPlease submit a COMPLETED Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summons. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.