Hankerson et al v. Bank of America et al
| Theresa Ann Hankerson and Rohan Ron Hankerson |
| Bank Of America, Commissioner Bank of America, District Court of Queens,, Attorney, Commissioner Judges Commissioner of Queens Blvd, N.Y.S. Officer of Temporary Disability and Assistance, Commissioner, Vintage T.V. Website Commissioner |
| 1:2024cv02088 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| James R Cho |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (AF) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-01750. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF). |
| The case of Hankerson et al v. Bank of America et al, has been transferred from Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 24-cv-2088. PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (AF) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number [CIVIL JUDGMENT] 5. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (yv) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] |
| ***DELETED ENTRY. Deleted entry Civil Case Terminated. The entry was incorrectly filed in this case. (yv) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York (yv) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] |
Filing 5
TRANSFER ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes the case in the Southern District of New York. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/7/24) (yv)[Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF).
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] |
| MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 by Rohan Ron Hankerson, Theresa Ann Hankerson. (AF) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Theresa Ann Henkerson consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Theresa Ann Hankerson..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF). |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Theresa Ann Hankerson..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF). Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Assistance, Commissioner, Vintage T.V. Website Commissioner, Attorney, Bank of America, Commissioner Bank of America, Commissioner Judges Commissioner of Queens Blvd, District Court of Queens,, N.Y.S. Officer of Temporary Disability. Document filed by Rohan Ron Hankerson, Theresa Ann Hankerson..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] Modified on 3/21/2024 (AF). |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 3/21/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
