Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Multimed Supply, Inc. et al
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and GEICO Casualty Company |
Multimed Supply, Inc., NYC Best Medical Supply, Inc., NYC Great Supply, Inc., Ortho Shoes Corp. doing business as Rego Aid, Big Wave Supply, Inc., Moshe Rangini, Irina Rangini, Vladimir Abramov and John Doe Defendants "1-10" |
1:2024cv02314 |
March 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Marcia M Henry |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (SDM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Vladimir Abramov, Big Wave Supply, Inc., Multimed Supply, Inc., NYC Best Medical Supply, Inc., NYC Great Supply, Inc., Ortho Shoes Corp., Irina Rangini, Moshe Rangini. (SDM) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Levy, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vladimir Abramov, Big Wave Supply, Inc., John Doe Defendants "1-10", Multimed Supply, Inc., NYC Best Medical Supply, Inc., NYC Great Supply, Inc., Ortho Shoes Corp., Irina Rangini, Moshe Rangini filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17719110 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - No,, filed by GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons and Rider, #3 Exhibit 1 - Representative Sample of Fraudulent Claims Identified to Date - Multimed Supply Inc., #4 Exhibit 2 - Representative Sample of Fraudulent Claims Identified to Date - NYC Best Medical Supply Inc., #5 Exhibit 3 - Representative Sample of Fraudulent Claims Identified to Date - Ortho Shoes Corp., #6 Exhibit 4 - Representative Sample of Fraudulent Claims Identified to Date - NYC Great Supply Inc, #7 Exhibit 5 - Representative Sample of Fraudulent Claims Identified to Date - Big Wave Supply Inc.) (Levy, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.