Turdieva et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Irada Turdieva, Dilshod Turdiev, Jasurbek Turdiev, Raykhon Turdieva, Jasmina Turdieva and Rakhmanbek Turdiev |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2024cv02622 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 jr Judicial Review |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tamunotonte Fenny on behalf of Dilshod Turdiev, Jasurbek Turdiev, Rakhmanbek Turdiev, Irada Turdieva, Jasmina Turdieva, Raykhon Turdieva (notification declined or already on case) (Fenny, Tamunotonte) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Tamunotonte Fenny) by Jasurbek Turdiev, Rakhmanbek Turdiev, Irada Turdieva, Jasmina Turdieva, Raykhon Turdieva. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed by Rakhmanbek Turdiev, Dilshod Turdiev, Raykhon Turdieva, Jasmina Turdieva, Irada Turdieva, Jasurbek Turdiev. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
| FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 1000013714 (KD) |
| PRO HAVE VICE FILING FEE RECEIVED(Tamunotonte Fenny): $ 200.00, receipt number 1000013714 (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
