Rivera et al v. Rebel Dawg, Inc., et al
| Anais Rivera, Catherine Karnoff, Chloe Lyttles, Meghan Sever, Richmond Jeffrey and David Yett |
| Rebel Dawg, Inc., and Stacie Amador |
| 1:2024cv02765 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Meghan Sever (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Chloe Lyttles (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Catherine Karnoff (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Richmond Jeffrey (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Anais Rivera (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Richmond Jeffrey, Catherine Karnoff, Chloe Lyttles, Anais Rivera, Meghan Sever (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stacie Amador, Rebel Dawg, Inc.,, David Yett filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17771494 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Chloe Lyttles, Catherine Karnoff, Anais Rivera, Meghan Sever, Richmond Jeffrey. (Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
