Gao v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Yan Gao
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Patricia Menges
Case Number: 1:2024cv02816
Filed: April 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nicholas G Garaufis
Referring Judge: Marcia M Henry
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/31/2024. (TLH)
May 31, 2024 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by the parties by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges (Bashyrov, Jacob)
May 30, 2024 Case Reassigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis. Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry no longer assigned as presider to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DA)
May 29, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Bashyrov on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges (aty to be noticed) (Bashyrov, Jacob)
May 29, 2024 NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (SY)
April 22, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges (aty to be noticed) (OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC, )
April 17, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yan Gao. Merrick B. Garland served on 4/17/2024, answer due 6/17/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 4/17/2024, answer due 6/17/2024; Patricia Menges served on 4/17/2024, answer due 6/17/2024. (Gu, Wei)
April 17, 2024 Opinion or Order STATUS REPORT ORDER: The parties shall file a status report by 07/16/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 04/17/2024. (RA)
April 16, 2024 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM)
April 16, 2024 Filing 3 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (SDM)
April 16, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges. (SDM)
April 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17776503 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Yan Gao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Gu, Wei)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gao v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yan Gao
Represented By: Wei Gu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Menges
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?