Puma v. Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. et al
Paul L. Puma |
Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. and Rodger Haye |
1:2024cv02858 |
April 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ramon E Reyes |
Vera M Scanlon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Discovery Request from Megan M. Murphy by Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc.. (Murphy, Megan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Marie Murphy on behalf of Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Murphy, Megan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Paul L. Puma TO TAKE DEPOSITION AS TO DEFENDANTS (Hoffman, Steven) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Hoffman on behalf of Paul L. Puma (aty to be noticed) (Hoffman, Steven) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rodger Haye, Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. i/s/h/a Rog & Chrissy Trucking, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. i/s/h/a Rog & Chrissy Trucking, Inc. for Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. i/s/h/a Rog & Chrissy Trucking, Inc.. (Schwartz, Bryan) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rodger Haye, Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. i/s/h/a Rog & Chrissy Trucking, Inc. (Schwartz, Bryan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Rodger Haye, Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. i/s/h/a Rog & Chrissy Trucking, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 524977/2023. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-17781632) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Defendant's Answer, #4 Exhibit C - Defendant's Demand for Damages, #5 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's Bill of Particulars, #6 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Response to Demand for Damages) (Schwartz, Bryan) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.