Moore v. The Long Island Railroad Company
| Jacqueline Moore |
| The Long Island Railroad Company |
| 1:2024cv03878 |
| May 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Court adopts the parties' proposed case management plan, see ECF No. #11 , as the Court's scheduling order required by Rule 16(b), with the adjustments reflected in the accompanying order. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/9/2024. (PN)
|
| Filing 11 Proposed Scheduling Order by Jacqueline Moore (Chiatto, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 Letter (Initial Joint Letter) by Jacqueline Moore (Chiatto, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Long Island Railroad Company. (Goins, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Long Island Railroad Company (Goins, Jacob) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by July 8, 2024, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff's counsel shall notify Defendant's counsel of this scheduling order, in writing, as soon as reasonably possible.Although the Court will be amenable to a reasonable extension of Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint, the Court will require the parties to demonstrate additional good cause to adjourn the deadline for filing the joint letter and proposed case management plan required by this order because the Court does not need Defendant's answer to set a discovery schedule. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on June 20, 2024. (PN)
|
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT re: service by Jacqueline Moore (Vogt, Philip) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jacqueline Moore. The Long Island Railroad Company waiver sent on 6/3/2024, answer due 8/2/2024. (Vogt, Philip) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Long Island Railroad Company. (CV) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Long Island Railroad Company filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17926365 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Jacqueline Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Vogt, Philip) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before June 20, 2024, describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause. The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 5/30/2024. (RCM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. The Long Island Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacqueline Moore | |
| Represented By: | Philip Patrick Vogt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Long Island Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Alan Goins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
