Cruz v. Hamido Seafood, Corp. et al
Rodrigo Ramos Cruz |
Hamido Seafood, Corp. and Moghared Mansy |
1:2024cv04152 |
June 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Taryn A Merkl |
Nina R Morrison |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Reassigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (BBM) |
NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (ES) |
Filing 14 Letter of intent to file 12(b) motion to facilitate assignment of District Judge by Hamido Seafood, Corp., Moghared Mansy (Jacobs, Lee) |
ORDER: The motion for extension of time #13 is granted, on consent. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 8/16/2024.The parties are reminded that this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Court's Direct Assignment Pilot Program, which is governed by Administrative Order 2023-23. The Administrative Order, answers to Frequently Asked Questions about the Pilot Program, information about consenting to a Magistrate Judge, and a biography of the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case are on the Courts website at # https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. The parties are respectfully directed to confer regarding whether both parties consent to jurisdiction by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. If the parties so consent, the parties should file the consent form available at # https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge. The parties are also respectfully reminded that, unless all parties consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, if a party intends to file a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b), that party must file a letter no longer than one page indicating such intent in order to facilitate assignment of this case to a District Judge as the presiding judge. See Admin. Order No. 2023-23 at 2. Any such letter shall be filed by 8/9/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 7/1/2024. (ES) |
Filing 13 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Summons Returned Executed, #7 Summons Returned Executed by Hamido Seafood, Corp., Moghared Mansy. (Jacobs, Lee) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn Chowdhury on behalf of Hamido Seafood, Corp., Moghared Mansy (aty to be noticed) (Chowdhury, Shawn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee N. Jacobs on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Jacobs, Lee) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 9 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz. Moghared Mansy served on 6/18/2024, answer due 7/9/2024. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz. Hamido Seafood, Corp. served on 6/14/2024, answer due 7/8/2024. (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz (Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hamido Seafood, Corp., Moghared Mansy. (KD) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hamido Seafood, Corp., Moghared Mansy filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17966265 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Rodrigo Ramos Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kumar, Amit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.