Unger v. Lot Polish Airlines
| Sholom Unger |
| Lot Polish Airlines |
| 1:2024cv04646 |
| June 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lara K Eshkenazi |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James Di Maggio on behalf of Lot Polish Airlines (aty to be noticed) (Di Maggio, James) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lot Polish Airlines. (VRM) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a summons against the Defendant and the United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons, complaint and a copy of this Order upon the Defendant without prepayment of fees. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi on 7/11/2024. (MED)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (SDM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sholom Unger. (SDM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lot Polish Airlines, James Di Maggio, filed by Sholom Unger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SDM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Unger v. Lot Polish Airlines | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lot Polish Airlines | |
| Represented By: | James Di Maggio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sholom Unger | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
