Yu v. Cardinale
Plaintiff: Saiying Yu
Defendant: Acting District Dir. Joseph Cardinale
Case Number: 1:2024cv05798
Filed: August 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2024 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Saiying Yu (Tarzia, Rachel)
August 20, 2024 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Saiying Yu (Tarzia, Rachel)
August 20, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Cardinale filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18195029 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Saiying Yu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tabs A-F) (Tarzia, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yu v. Cardinale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saiying Yu
Represented By: Rachel Tarzia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting District Dir. Joseph Cardinale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?