Committee for the Advancement of Torah v. The Hub Food Management Company
Plaintiff: Committee for the Advancement of Torah doing business as OK Kosher Certification
Defendant: The Hub Food Management Company doing business as PITA Inn
Case Number: 1:2024cv05846
Filed: August 21, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2024 Filing 14 Request for Certificate of Default by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Request for Certificate of Default, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 to Declaration, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Certificate of Default) (Sacks, Ira)
October 17, 2024 Filing 13 Letter re Status by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira)
October 17, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER re: #13 . There is no reason to hold an Initial Status Conference when there is no reason to believe the defendant will appear. Plaintiff refers to having a discussion about "Rule 55 remedies" but Rule 55 is self-explanatory. The conference is therefore adjourned without date, provided that plaintiff shall request entry of default from the Clerk by 10/22/2024 and shall move for default judgment within 14 days after default is entered. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/17/2024. (PW)
September 30, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER re: #12 . Initial Status Conference adjourned to 10/18/2024 at 11:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687# and are reminded of their obligations to comply with the mandatory requirements at #7 with regard to the conference. In addition, counsel is advised that this letter should have been filed as an ECF event Letter "Motion" since it seeks relief from the Court. Do not refile. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/30/2024. (PW)
September 29, 2024 Filing 12 Letter re Status by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira)
September 12, 2024 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Committee for the Advancement of Torah. The Hub Food Management Company served on 9/12/2024, answer due 10/3/2024. (Sacks, Ira)
September 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that Good cause is found for alternative service in the manner described below re #9 Letter filed by Committee for the Advancement of Torah. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/10/2024 ) (RG)
September 10, 2024 Filing 9 Letter per this Court's Order of today's date by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira)
September 10, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER deferring ruling on #8 . The Court would So Order this motion except that plaintiff's counsel has submitted it in a locked form that will not accept endorsement of the Court's e-signature. Submit it in an unlocked form. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/10/2024. (PW)
September 9, 2024 Filing 8 Letter requesting pre-motion conference by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Sacks, Ira)
August 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 10/7/2024 at 11:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/23/2024. (PW)
August 22, 2024 Filing 6 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (RC)
August 22, 2024 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM)
August 22, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Hub Food Management Company. (SDM)
August 22, 2024 Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM)
August 21, 2024 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira)
August 21, 2024 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira)
August 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Committee for the Advancement of Torah filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18201755 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Committee for the Advancement of Torah. (Sacks, Ira)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Committee for the Advancement of Torah v. The Hub Food Management Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Hub Food Management Company doing business as PITA Inn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Committee for the Advancement of Torah doing business as OK Kosher Certification
Represented By: Ira S. Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?