Committee for the Advancement of Torah v. The Hub Food Management Company
Committee for the Advancement of Torah doing business as OK Kosher Certification |
The Hub Food Management Company doing business as PITA Inn |
1:2024cv05846 |
August 21, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brian M Cogan |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Request for Certificate of Default by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Request for Certificate of Default, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 to Declaration, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Certificate of Default) (Sacks, Ira) |
Filing 13 Letter re Status by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 Letter re Status by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Committee for the Advancement of Torah. The Hub Food Management Company served on 9/12/2024, answer due 10/3/2024. (Sacks, Ira) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Letter per this Court's Order of today's date by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Letter requesting pre-motion conference by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Sacks, Ira) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (RC) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Hub Food Management Company. (SDM) |
Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Committee for the Advancement of Torah (Sacks, Ira) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Committee for the Advancement of Torah filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18201755 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Committee for the Advancement of Torah. (Sacks, Ira) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Committee for the Advancement of Torah v. The Hub Food Management Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Hub Food Management Company doing business as PITA Inn | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Committee for the Advancement of Torah doing business as OK Kosher Certification | |
Represented By: | Ira S. Sacks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.