Su v. White Noise Coffee I Corp. et al
United States Department of Labor and Julie A. Su |
White Noise Coffee 2 Corp. doing business as White Noise Coffee Co., Milk Under Cafe Inc. doing business as White Noise Coffee Co., Han Flanagan, Su Hyung Kim, White Noise Coffee I Corp. doing business as White Noise Coffee Co. and Vanesa Kim |
1:2024cv06645 |
September 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joseph A Marutollo |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held on November 4, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo. To participate in the conference, the parties shall dial (646) 828-7666; Meeting ID: 161 339 5490; Passcode: 789241. The parties must complete the attached proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order and file it on ECF no later than October 30, 2024. Plaintiff is directed to ensure that all Defendants are aware of this conference. Counsel with knowledge of the case must attend the conference; per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. The parties are directed to review this Court's Individual Practices and Rules in advance of the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo on 9/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Individual Practices and Rules) (EG) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Julie A. Su (Wilmsen, Amanda) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Julie A. Su. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons) (Wilmsen, Amanda) |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must be a rider attached to the one (1)Proposed summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included. Do not file a separate proposed summons for each defendant. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.