Sterlin v. New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital et al
Frantzcesca Sterlin |
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Kathleen Moschella, Osice Harding and Aida Rivera |
1:2024cv06912 |
October 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Robert M Levy |
Natasha C Merle |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Blair on behalf of Osice Harding, Kathleen Moschella, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Aida Rivera (aty to be noticed) (Blair, Amanda) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Warren Reiter on behalf of Osice Harding, Kathleen Moschella, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Aida Rivera (aty to be noticed) (Reiter, Justin) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Frantzcesca Sterlin. Kathleen Moschella waiver sent on 10/3/2024, answer due 12/2/2024. (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Frantzcesca Sterlin. Aida Rivera waiver sent on 10/3/2024, answer due 12/2/2024. (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Frantzcesca Sterlin. Osice Harding waiver sent on 10/3/2024, answer due 12/2/2024. (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Frantzcesca Sterlin. New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital waiver sent on 10/3/2024, answer due 12/2/2024. (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Osice Harding, Kathleen Moschella, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Aida Rivera. (KD) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Frantzcesca Sterlin (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Frantzcesca Sterlin (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18339472 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Frantzcesca Sterlin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue) (Jean-Pierre, Alexandria) |
Case Assigned to Judge Natasha C. Merle and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.