BLDG Oceanside LLC v. Atlantic Avenue Capital LLC et al
| Bldg Oceanside LLC |
| 980 Atlantic Holdings LLC, Atlantic Avenue Capital LLC, Transit Wireless LLC and Chaskiel Strulovitch |
| 1:2024cv07260 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| James R Cho |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (SDM) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SDM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 980 Atlantic Holdings LLC from Supreme Court of the State of New York, case number 523751/2022. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-18441769) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Document List, #3 Exhibit Docs 1-10, #4 Exhibit Docs 11-27, #5 Exhibit Docs 30-32, #6 Exhibit Docs 34-36, #7 Exhibit Doc 50, #8 Exhibit Doc 51) (Nutovic, Isaac) |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information:*****Filing Attorney used the incorrect event (ANSWER) when opening this case. Please refile using the correct event NOTICE OF REMOVAL-Under Notices. Correctly File the Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet, State Court Records and pay the Civil Filing Fee for the following case so that it may be processed. (KD) |
| Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by 980 Atlantic Holdings LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Document List, #3 A -Documents 1-10, #4 A-Documents 11-27, #5 A-Documents 30-32, #6 A Document 33, #7 A Document 34-36, #8 A Documents 40-49, #9 A Documents 50-51) (Nutovic, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
