-ARL Zysk et al v. Smith
Irene K. Zysk and Robert J. Zysk |
John Wayne Smith |
Irene K. Zysk and Robert J. Zysk |
2:2003cv04334 |
July 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Denis R. Hurley |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER: 86 Letter filed by John Wayne Smith is denied to the extent that trial will begin on Wednesday, January 5, 2011 at 9:30 am. If defendant is not present on that date, a default judgment will be entered against him.. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 1/3/2011. (Best, Patricia) |
Filing 84 ORDER denying 83 Motion for Contempt et al: Plaintiffs' motion to hold Defendant in contempt and to have New York's Lien Law apply to the present dispute is denied. The second and eighth causes of action which seek relief under the New York Lien Law are dismissed. The parties are directed to address specified issues in their pre-trial memoranda. See Memorandum & Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/2/2010. (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 77 ORDER SETTING Final Pretrial/ settlemwnt Conference for 8/11/2010 11:00 AM before Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley. The parties are to submit their settlement positions by mail or fax on or before 8/6/2010.. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 7/14/2010. (Best, Patricia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.