Ohlson v. The Cadle Company, Inc. et al
Paul Ohlson |
Bobby D. Associates, Daniel C. Cadle, John Doe, John and Jane Does, John and Jane Does number 26 through 50, The Cadle Company, Inc., Steven Vlock and Vlock and Associates, P.C. |
John Doe and The Cadle Company, Inc. |
Paul Ohlson |
2:2004cv03418 |
March 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
E. Thomas Boyle |
Denis R. Hurley |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 ORDER re 171 Order to Show Cause,,,: The appeal of Magistrate Judge Boyle's Order dated March 29, 2010 and the request for stay are denied. See attached Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 4/16/2010. |
Filing 148 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For all of the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's request to compel the noticed depositions for the place noticed are granted, subject to modification of time and place, on consent of all parties, provided, however, that these depositions shall be completed by April 30, 2010. SEE order for further details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/1/2010. (Joy, Dolores) |
Filing 126 ORDER re 109 Order to Show Cause, : For the reason set forth in the attached Memorandum, the Court finds that the failure to serve Added Defendants with a summons does not provide a basis for dismissal of the claims that remain as against them. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/18/2009. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.