Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ishopnomarkup.com, Inc. et al
2:2004cv04057 |
September 20, 2004 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Denis R. Hurley |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 299 ORDER denying 298 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Knight's motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 4/6/2017. (Kaley, Regina) |
Filing 296 ORDER denying 292 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 293 Motion for Reconsideration : Knight's motions for reconsideration are denied. See attached Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/8/2016. (Copy mailed to Knight by Chambers) (Gapinski, Michele) |
Filing 291 ORDER denying 285 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 286 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Knight's motions for reconsideration are denied. The SEC is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Knight. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 8/18/2016. (Kaley, Regina) |
Filing 269 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 262 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b); denying 265 Motion for New Trial; For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion pursuant to Rules 50 and 59 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for post-trial relief is granted as follows: Knight is permanently enjoined fromviolating Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and 10b-5 thereunder; Knight is permanently enjoined from serving as an officer or director o f a public company; Knight is ordered to disgorge ill-gotten gains in the amount of $2.3 million and to pay prejudgment interest on the disgorgement in the amount of$2,519,140.23; Knight shall pay civil monetary penalties in the amount of $330,000; Knight shall pay plaintiff for deposition costs in the amount of $24,202.58. The clerk of the Court is directed to enter the attached judgment and to close this case. (Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/3/2015.) (Fagan, Linda) |
Filing 184 ORDER re 168 , 169 , 181 , 182 : For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, pro se defendant Anthony Knight's March 12, 2012 motion for reconsideration is denied. The SEC's motion in limine is now deemed fully briefed. All part ies are directed to appear in Courtroom 930 on May 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. for oral argument. A date for jury selection and trial will be set thereafter. Counsel for the SEC is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon pro se defendant Knight forthwith and to file proof of service on ECF. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 1/10/2013. (Monaco, Laura) |
Filing 165 ORDER denying 157 : For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Commission's motion for an officer and director bar is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/3/2012. (Monaco, Laura) |
Filing 151 ORDER : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 1/26/2011. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 143 ORDER re 142 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/22/2010. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ishopnomarkup.com, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.