Conte v. County of Nassau, New York et al
| 2:2006cv04746 |
| August 30, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
716
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law is denied in its entirety. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/3/2017. (Hammond, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
651
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein and on the record during the trial, plaintiffs Rule 59 motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for his claims of tortious interference with contractual relationships is denied. The judgment in plaintiffs favor will follow. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 4/2/2015. (Street, Caitlin)
|
|
Filing
624
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons contained herein, the County defendants' Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law is granted in its entirety Wasilausky is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs false arrest claim an d Emmons, Falzarano and Wallace are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's tortious interference with contract claim. The County defendants' Rule 59 motion for a new trial and plaintiff's Rule 59 motion for a new damages trial are denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of the County defendants and close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/26/2013. (Samplin, Ilissa)
|
|
Filing
462
ORDER denying 390 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 404 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 407 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 409 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in p art and denying in part 411 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, that after a detailed review of the record and submissions of the parties, the Court grants defendants' motions for summary judgment in part and denies the motions for summary judgment in part. Specifically, the Court concludes that the County defendants are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claims for malicious prosecution, violation of the Fi rst Amendment, and conspiracy under § 1983. The Court further determines that plaintiff's federal and state-law false arrest (against defendant Wasilausky) and abuse of process (against all County defendants but Sardo) claims survive summa ry judgment because of disputed issues of material fact with respect to those claims. Plaintiff's Monell claim against the County of Nassau also survives summary judgment. The Court also concludes that defendant Sardo is entitled to summary ju dgment on all claims against her on grounds of absolute immunity as to the federal and state-law false arrest claims and lack of personal involvement with respect to the other claims, and defendants Emmons, Wallace, and Falzarano are entitled to summ ary judgment on the federal and state-law false arrest claim, because of lack of sufficient evidence of personal involvement in the investigation that led to the arrest. With respect to plaintiff's remaining state-law claims, the Court denies t he County defendants and Guerra summary judgment on plaintiff's tortious interference with contractual relationships claim and grants summary judgment to defendant Shaska on that claim. Plaintiff's remaining state-law claims for defamation , injurious falsehood, and intentional infliction of emotional distress are barred by the statute of limitations as against all defendants. Finally, with respect to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the same disputed issues of fact that preclude summary judgment in defendants' favor on the remaining claims also preclude summary judgment in plaintiff's favor. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/30/2010. (Weisgerber, Erica)
|
|
Filing
317
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: The County defendants motion for a protective order is granted in part and denied in part. The County defendants are directed to submit for in camera review Document Numbers 26-29, 40-42, 44-46 and 51, as listed on the Revise d Privilege Log dated March 13, 2009, within ten (10) days of the date of this decision, for a determination as to whether those documents should be exempt from disclosure as opinion work product. In all other respects, the motion is denied and the County defendants are directed to produce all of the remaining documents identified on the Revised Privilege Log to plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of this decision. The production shall be made pursuant to the terms of the confidentialit y order, entered this same date. Counsel for the County defendants is directed to serve a copy of the attached decision on plaintiff upon receipt. So Ordered. SEE attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 5/15/2009. (c/m to pro se plaintiff) (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
Filing
305
ORDER denying 179 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Larry Guerra's motion for reconsideration is denied in its entirety. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 2/13/2009. (Worden, Katherine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conte v. County of Nassau, New York et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
