Stephens v. 1199 SEIU, AFL-CIO et al
Plaintiff: Precious Stephens
Defendant: 1199 SEIU, AFL-CIO and Bayview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Case Number: 2:2007cv00596
Filed: February 12, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
County: Nassau
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: A. Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order, the Court GRANTS 95 97 Defendants' summary judgment motions, and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's hybrid § 301/DFR claims. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/23/2014. (Lo, Justin)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER re 72 Letter, 71 Letter, 70 Letter. For the reasons set in the ATTACHED ORDER, the Plaintiff's motion to have her deposition conducted telephonically is hereby GRANTED in part, to the following extent: (A) Plaintiff's depositio n can be taken telephonically now, but Plaintiff must appear and be deposed in the Eastern District of New York 48 hours before the trial begins (in this instance, the Defendants are free to video-conference the proximate deposition, at their expense ); or (B) if the Plaintiff intends to treat the upcoming deposition as a trial-preservation deposition, than the deposition must be conducted by video-conference and Plaintiff's counsel must take steps to ensure that the deposition is taped. In either instance, the costs for conducting the deposition will be borne by the Plaintiff and it will be the Plaintiff's obligation to ensure that the deposition complies with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(b). Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 7/19/2011. (Spatola, Richard)
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 60 and 61 Defendants' Motions to take Plaintiff's Deposition. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. A modified Case Management and Scheduling Order setting forth the deadlines for the remainder of the pre-trial phase of the case will be entered separately. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 8/19/2009. (Tomlinson, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. 1199 SEIU, AFL-CIO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Precious Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1199 SEIU, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Sara D. Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Represented By: William Matthew Groh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?