First Data Merchant Services Corporation v. Oxford Management Services, Inc.
First Data Merchant Services Corporation |
Oxford Management Services, Inc. |
2:2007cv02083 |
May 22, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Suffolk |
E. Thomas Boyle |
Joanna Seybert |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER granting 60 Motion for Damages for the reasons stated in the attachment Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/27/2013. (Mauskopf, Roslynn) |
Filing 58 ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS: That all counterclaims pled by Oxford are hereby DISMISSED; and That FDMS shall submit by October 1, 2012 sufficient evidence and/or affidavits supporting its measure of damages on its breach of contract claim in order for the Court to enter judgment in favor of FDMS as against Oxford on plaintiff's breach of contract claim pursuant to this Court's Summary Judgment Order. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/24/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn) |
Filing 55 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 54 : Pursuant to the attached Order to Show Cause, the Court hereby ORDERS Oxford to Show Cause in writing, by April 9, 2012 by letter filed electronically with this Court and served on counsel for plaintiff, whether it inte nds to pursue its counterclaims or otherwise defend this action. Failure to so do will result in this Court entering default judgment against defendant Oxford in favor of plaintiff FDMS on plaintiffs claims on which this Court has already granted su mmary judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCivP), and dismissing all of defendant Oxfords counterclaims pled herein for failure to prosecute pursuant to this Courts authority under FRCivP 16. This Court FURTHER ORDE RS that plaintiff FDMS serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause on defendant Oxford by April 3, 2012 in any manner specified in FRCivP 4, and immediately thereafter electronically file proof of such service with the Court. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment: SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on liability as to the breach of contract claim is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for an accounting is DENIED. The Court will address damages at a conference to be scheduled by separate order. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: First Data Merchant Services Corporation v. Oxford Management Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: First Data Merchant Services Corporation | |
Represented By: | John A. Wait |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Oxford Management Services, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.