Advanced Care, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services Featured Case

Plaintiff Advanced Care Inc. alleges that the Medicare Appeals Council abused its discretion and acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied a request to review a claim for supplementary medical insurance benefits for a beneficiary.

Plaintiff: Advanced Care, Inc.
Defendant: Department of Health & Human Services
Case Number: 2:2007cv04588
Filed: November 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Care, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Care, Inc.
Represented By: Richard E. Fish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Health & Human Services
Represented By: James Halleron Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?