Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et al v. Central Design Systems, Inc. et al
| Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, National Energy Management Institute Committee for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry, Sheet Metal Occupational Health Institute Trust, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund |
| Central Design Systems, Inc. and Thomas Nofer |
| 2:2008cv00968 |
| March 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Suffolk |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER - It is hereby: ORDERED, that Judge Tomlinsons 18 Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a default judgment against Thomas Nofer in the amount of $ ;96,320.26, plus pre-judgment interest on $77,100.22 calculated at the rate provided in 26 U.S.C. § 6621 and accruing from June 30, 2007 to the date hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt, on 9/2/10. *Terminating 6 Motion for Default Judgment, 18 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/2/2010. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
