Gaskin v. Graham
Petitioner: Wayne Jay Gaskin
Respondent: Harold Graham
Case Number: 2:2008cv01124
Filed: March 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Gaskin has demonstrated no basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Accordingly, the petition is denied on the merits. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment is also denied. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 12/30/2009. (Weisgerber, Erica)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaskin v. Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wayne Jay Gaskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?