Robinson v. Suffolk County Police Department et al
Ronald S. Robinson |
Suffolk County Police Department and John Does #1 and #2 |
2:2008cv01874 |
July 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Suffolk |
Joanna Seybert |
A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER re Defendants' objections to Plaintiff's purported expert report [DE 98]. Plaintiff is precluded from introducing Dr. Durkin as an expert witness under Rule 26 at trial. The purported "expert report" is also precluded. How ever, Dr. Durkin may testify at trial in his capacity as Plaintiff's treating physician in accordance with this Order. If Defendants' counsel intends to take the deposition of Dr. Durkin as Plaintiff's treating physician, he must do so prior to the November 14, 2011 trial date.Since the issues surrounding Dr. Durkin's testimony are now resolved, the Court finds that a conference to address this matter (see DE 99, 101) is moot and no longer necessary. However, the Court is scheduling a trial preparation conference for October 26, 2011 at noon. Both sides are required to attend in person. Defendants' counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon the Plaintiff pro se forthwith and to file proof of service on ECF. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for my detailed rulings. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 10/17/2011. (Sofio, Lisa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.