Monahan v. Pena et al
| James Monahan |
| Raymond Pena, Doris Pena, Eladio Sanchez, Yuma Bay Development Corp., Juan Carlos Lopez, Brigid Lenderborg and Lenderborg Lending Service |
| 2:2008cv02258 |
| June 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Nassau |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Plaintiff's com plaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action and closing this case. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on Plaintiff and to note the service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 1/11/2013. (Francis, Ogoro)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants the individual defendants motion to dismiss. The remaining parties shall proceed with discovery at the direction of Magistrate Judge Lindsay. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 8/4/2011. (Nagiel, Svetlana)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss in part and denies it in part. The Cou rt grants the motion to dismiss as to the claims asserted by the Yuma Bay Real Estate Purchasers. The Court denies the motion to dismiss as to the breach of contract claim brought by Panam Management. The Court also denies without prejudice the cor porate officer defendants' motion to dismiss the claims against them. Additionally, the Court denies without prejudice defendants' motion to stay this action. The remaining parties shall proceed with discovery at the direction of Magistrate Judge Lindsay. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/14/2010. (Quigley, Brendan)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; terminating 14 Motion to Stay. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is GRANTED. Howeve r, because plaintiff has made a motion to amend to correct the jurisdictional defect in a Second Amended Complaint, the Court requires additional briefing to address the proposed amendment, including whether it would cure subject matter jurisdiction deficiencies. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties participate in a telephone conference on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. to establish a schedule for the parties to submit additional briefing regarding whether the Court shou ld grant leave to the plaintiff to submit a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At the appropriate time, counsel for plaintiff shall initiate the call by getting counsel for defendants on the line, and shall then contact Chambers at (631) 712-5670. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 8/18/2009. (Howard, Timothy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
