Fordham et al v. Islip Union Free School District et al
| Sonia Fordham and John Fordham |
| Islip Union Free School District and Diane Druckman |
| 2:2008cv02310 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Suffolk |
| Denis R. Hurley |
| William D. Wall |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This Amended Memorandum and Order replaces and vacates the Courts prior Memorandum and Order dated August 8, 2012. (See docket no. 34 .) See footnote 2 of the attached opinion for details. As previously held, defendants ' motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiffs' claims for retaliation under the ADEA and NYSHRL which are dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, the Court declines to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claim for defamation. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 8/13/2012. (Malley, Sean)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: As set forth in the attached opinion, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiffs' claims for retaliation under the ADEA and NYSHRL which are dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, the Court declines to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claim for defamation. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 8/8/2012. (Malley, Sean)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss : Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted as to (1) all ADEA claims as against Druckman; (2) the ADEA and NYSHRL claims for hostile work environment; (3) the defamat ion claim arising from the June 2007 e-mail; (4) the claims for abuse of process, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress and prima facie tort; and (5) the New York State Whistle Blower claim. The motion is denied as to ( 1) the claims against the District under the ADEA and the NYSHRL for retaliation; (2) the claim against Druckman for retaliation under the NYSHRL; and (3) the defamation claim arising from Druckman's allegations regarding the head tapping incident and her September 27, 2009 report. See attached Memorandum & Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/11/2009. (Gapinski, Michele)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
