Hooda v. Brookhaven National Laboratory et al
Plaintiff: Balwan Singh Hooda
Defendant: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Michael Bebon, William Hempfling, William Robert Casey, George Goode and Michael Holland
Case Number: 2:2008cv03403
Filed: August 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Presiding Judge: William D. Wall
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND DECISION; Case Number 10CV1966 is hereby CONSOLIDATED with 08CV3403. All future filings are to be docketed only under 08CV3403. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark 10CV1966 as CLOSED. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file a C onsolidated Amended Complaint in 08CV3403 synthesizing the claims and allegations in both actions. This Consolidated Amended Complaint should not include any claims that the Court has already dismissed, or factual allegations that are relevant only w ith respect to the already dismissed claims. Plaintiff has until July 21, 2010 to file this Consolidated Amended Complaint. The parties should consult with Judge Wall concerning any discovery issues related to this consolidation, or the filing of Plaintiff's Consolidated Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/21/10. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND DECISION - Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court's September 15, 2009 Order partially dismissing his Complaint. Under Local Civil Rule 6.3, Plaintiff had to file any such motion within 14 days of the Court's Order or September 29, 2009. Plaintiff did not do so, nor did he move for an extension of time within this period. It is now three and a half months later. The Court will not, e ffectively, extend Plaintiff's time to respond by several months, especially where Plaintiff has provided no grounds or explanation for such a motion would succeed. The Court's electronic order, dated January 13, 2010, granting Plaintiff's motion was issued in error and is a nullity. SO ORDERED by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/13/2010. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
September 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND DECISION; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss. The Brookhaven Defts' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims brought against Brookhaven National Laboratory are dismissed in the ir entirety. Count I, II and V are dismissed as to Defts Bebon, Hempfling, Casey, Goode and Holland, and insofar as they assert claims for "color" discrimination and hostile work environment. Count III is dismissed against Bebon, Goode an d Holland, and insofar as it alleges national origin discrimination and violations of 42 U.S.C. 1983. Count IV and the two separate counts both pled as Count VI are dismissed in their entirety. The Brookhaven Defts motion to stay discovery pending a decision on their motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Mr Hooda' cross motion for full discovery is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Mr. Hooda is entitled to normal discovery with respect to his non-dismissed claims. ( ( Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert, on 9/15/09 ) c/m c/ecf. (Fagan, Linda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hooda v. Brookhaven National Laboratory et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Balwan Singh Hooda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Bebon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Hempfling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Robert Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Goode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?