Haynes v. Ercole

Haynes v. Ercole

Petitioner:	Michael Haynes
Respondent:	Robert Ercole
Case Number:	2:2008cv03643
Filed:	August 29, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 8, 2011	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, petitioner has demonstrated no basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Because petitioner h as failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 6/8/2011. (Nagiel, Svetlana)
March 6, 2009	Filing 10 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Stay; granting 9 Motion to Stay: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, petitioner's request to stay any action on his writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. A copy of this Order has been mailed to petitioner. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/6/2009. (Joo, Anna)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 8, 2011

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, petitioner has demonstrated no basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Because petitioner h as failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 6/8/2011. (Nagiel, Svetlana)

March 6, 2009

Filing 10 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Stay; granting 9 Motion to Stay: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, petitioner's request to stay any action on his writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. A copy of this Order has been mailed to petitioner. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/6/2009. (Joo, Anna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Ercole
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Haynes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Ercole
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?