Wood et al v. General Motors Corporation et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Wood et al v. General Motors Corporation et al

Wood et al v. General Motors Corporation et al

Case Number:	2:2008cv05224
Filed:	December 29, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Other Statutory Actions Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge:	A. Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 25, 2015	Filing 86 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss: For the reasons set forth in the attached, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is GRANTED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim pursuant to F ederal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs' federal claims are accordingly dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Additionally, Defendants' request for sanctions and Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint are both DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/25/2015. (Pelaez, Jenny)
September 15, 2010	Filing 52 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, and having reviewed the R&R for clear error, the Court adopts the findings and recommendations contained in the R&R in their entirety. Ev en under a de novo standard, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' cross-motion to a mend is granted, and plaintiffs are granted leave to re-plead by filing an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. A copy of this Order has been mailed to pro se plaintiffs by the Court. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/15/2010. (Weisgerber, Erica)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 25, 2015

Filing 86 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss: For the reasons set forth in the attached, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is GRANTED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim pursuant to F ederal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs' federal claims are accordingly dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Additionally, Defendants' request for sanctions and Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint are both DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/25/2015. (Pelaez, Jenny)

September 15, 2010

Filing 52 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, and having reviewed the R&R for clear error, the Court adopts the findings and recommendations contained in the R&R in their entirety. Ev en under a de novo standard, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' cross-motion to a mend is granted, and plaintiffs are granted leave to re-plead by filing an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. A copy of this Order has been mailed to pro se plaintiffs by the Court. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/15/2010. (Weisgerber, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood et al v. General Motors Corporation et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?