Benefitvision Inc. v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc. et al
| Benefitvision Inc. |
| Gentiva Health Services, Inc., Gentiva Services of New York Inc. and Gentiva Health Services, IPA Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00473 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Suffolk |
| Denis R. Hurley |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Benefitvision's objections to Magistrate Judge Tomlinson's Report and Recommendation are denied. The Court notes that although Judge Tomlinson's September 2010 Order permitted plaintiff to amend the ad damnum clause of the Complaint, plaintiff failed to formally file an amended complaint on the Courts docket. Plaintiff shall do so within thirty (30) days of this Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/10/2015. (Kaley, Regina)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying 123 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 137 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 1/28/2014. (O'Connor, Madeline)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER denying 105 Motion to Dismiss. Gentiva is directed to show cause by January 17, 2012 why this Court should not recommend to Judge Hurley that its counterclaims be dismissed. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 1/3/2012. (Sofio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER denying 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Ordered by Senior Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/14/2011. (Monaco, Laura)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 26 Motion for Discovery and Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Plaintiff's Motion [DE 26] is rejected, without prejudice, for failure to comply with Local Civil Rules 37.1 and 37.3 and my Individual Practice Rule III(A)(1), and because a motion to amend must be made by formal motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 10/20/2009. (Tobin, Ellen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
