Ceparano v. Suffolk Co. Dept of Health et al
| Anthony J. Ceparano |
| Suffolk Co. Dept of Health, S.C.C.F Medical Unit, Dept of Health Comm. Humayun Chaundry, S.C.C.F. Chief ADM Vincent Geraci, Doctor "Igor", Dr. Prentiss, Nurse Practicioner Alice, Nurse Practitioner "Jane Doe", Drug/Alcohol Counselor Eliana and Nurse "James Doe" LPN |
| 2:2009cv00558 |
| March 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Suffolk |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER denying 138 Motion for Reconsideration re 133 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, or, In the Alternative, His Motion for Reargument. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/4/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER granting 130 Motion for Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED that since plaintiff has not established an underlying constitutional violation or that anofficial policy or custom caused him to suffer a constitutional injury, defts' motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is granted. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 12/4/2013. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
