Levista, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Levista, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Levista, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Levista, Inc.
Defendant:	Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2009cv00569
Filed:	February 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge:	Michael L. Orenstein
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2010	Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 12/2/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)
February 4, 2010	Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Dfts' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, plff's claims for tortious interference with business relations (second cause of action) and specific performance (third cause of action) ar e dismissed with prejudice and plff's claim for breach of contract (first cause of action) is dismissed with leave to amend within 20 days from the date of entry of this order. Failure of plff to serve and file an amended complaint within 20 days from the date of entry of this order will result in the complaint being dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 2/4/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2010

Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 12/2/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)

February 4, 2010

Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Dfts' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, plff's claims for tortious interference with business relations (second cause of action) and specific performance (third cause of action) ar e dismissed with prejudice and plff's claim for breach of contract (first cause of action) is dismissed with leave to amend within 20 days from the date of entry of this order. Failure of plff to serve and file an amended complaint within 20 days from the date of entry of this order will result in the complaint being dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 2/4/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levista, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Levista, Inc.
Represented By:	Frederick P. Mose'
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?