Kapsis v. Brandveen et al
| James L. Kapsis |
| Antonio Brandveen and Arthur Diamond |
| 2:2009cv01352 |
| March 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| Nassau |
| Joanna Seybert |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM & ORDER - Pending before the Court is Dfts' motion for reconsideration of the Court's 7/20/09 Order. The Court hereby DENIES Dfts' 17 motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Pro Se Pltff by certified mail, return receipt. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/9/09. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court finds that the Dfts are immune from this suit. Accordingly, Pltff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good fai th and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Pro Se Pltff by certified mail return receipt, and mark this matter CLOSED. Signed by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/20/09 (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
