Conklin v. County of Suffolk et al
| James B. Conklin, Jr. |
| County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Board of Elections, Jesse Garcia, Cathy L Richter Geier, Denise A. Wilson and Chris P. Termini |
| 2:2009cv03014 |
| July 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Suffolk |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - ORDERED that the County Defendants motion for summary judgment with regard to the Plaintiffs hostile work environment claims is granted, but that the County Defendants motion for summary judgment with regard to the Plaintiffs retaliation claims is denied; and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant Wilsons motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant Garcias motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that the parties are directed to appear before the Court on May 22, 2012 at 9:00 am for a pre-trial conference in Courtroom 1020. Counsel shall have the authority to discuss settlement at this conference. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/3/2012. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
