Incantalupo et al v. Lawrence Union Free School District Number 15 et al
| Tara Incantalupo, Stephen Jackson, Andrew Levey, Stacey Sullivan and Fu-Yun Tang |
| Lawrence Union Free School District Number 15, The Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District Number 15, Murray Forman, David Sussman, Uri Kaufman, Asher Mansdorf, Michael Hatten, Solomon Blisko and Nahum Marcus |
| 2:2009cv03342 |
| August 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Nassau |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 64 Motion for Hearing. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' motion is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. The Court awards Defen dants' $5,000, to be assessed equally against Plaintiffs and Mr. Agostisi. Defendants' motion for a status conference concerning their pending attorneys' fees motion is, accordingly, DENIED AS MOOT. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/10/10. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION - Pltffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. Pltffs' Complaint is DISMISSED. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 8/24/09.C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
