Cummings-Fowler v. Suffolk County Community College et al
| Michelle Cummings-Fowler |
| Suffolk County Community College, James Canniff and Richard Britton |
| 2:2009cv03593 |
| August 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Suffolk |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER Re: 68 Motion for Summary Judgment - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Defendants motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety. The Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/4/2013. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to add retaliation claims against the defendant SCCC is granted, and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff is directed to serve the propose d Second Amended Complaint within ten days of the date of this order, and it is further ORDERED, that the parties are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lindsay for the limited purpose of reopening discovery to address the newly asserted claims. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/18/2012. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - The Plaintiffs Section 1983 Equal Protection claim against Canniff based on his allegedly inappropriate racial comments is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. However, the Court declines to dismis s the Section 1983 claim against Canniff in its entirety because the Plaintiff has adequately pled Canniffs direct involvement in the April 1, 2008 allegedly discriminatory hiring decision. In addition, to the extent the Defendants requested that the Court dismiss the Title VII hostile environment claim against them, that request is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/2/2010. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
