Fleurimond v. New York University

Fleurimond v. New York University

Plaintiff:	Ariel Fleurimond
Defendant:	New York University
Case Number:	2:2009cv03739
Filed:	August 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Presiding Judge:	A. Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 10, 2012	Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants 80 motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it and the complaint is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs 68 motion for summary judgmen t is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case as closed. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/10/12. Copy of "Decision" forwarded to Judgment Clerk via inter-office mail. (Coleman, Laurie)
July 29, 2011	Filing 63 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Discovery. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED. A telephone conference is hereby set for August 24, 2011 to discuss the remaining expert and pre-trial deadlines in this case which were held in abeyance pending decision on this motion. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 7/29/2011. (Reifman, Marli)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 10, 2012

Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants 80 motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it and the complaint is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs 68 motion for summary judgmen t is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case as closed. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/10/12. Copy of "Decision" forwarded to Judgment Clerk via inter-office mail. (Coleman, Laurie)

July 29, 2011

Filing 63 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Discovery. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED. A telephone conference is hereby set for August 24, 2011 to discuss the remaining expert and pre-trial deadlines in this case which were held in abeyance pending decision on this motion. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 7/29/2011. (Reifman, Marli)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleurimond v. New York University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ariel Fleurimond
Represented By:	Mona R. Conway
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?