Bottcher v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Office et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Bottcher v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Office et al

Bottcher v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Office et al

Case Number:	2:2009cv05462
Filed:	December 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge:	Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 15, 2013	Filing 45 ORDER re 43 Letter,, filed by County Of Suffolk, John Santacroce, Suffolk County Correctional Facility, Douglas Bassemir, County Attorney of Suffolk County, Victoria McCarrick, James Matthew, Suffolk County Sheriff's Office, Mic hael Hastings: Defendants' request to preserve the right to conduct a psychological examination of the plaintiff and to strike damages for emotional distress is denied on the ground that it is untimely. Discovery is certified as complete as o f December 31, 2012. A joint pre-trial order shall be filed, consistent with the individual rules of the assigned district judge, on or before March 4, 2013. Any party seeking leave to file a motion for summary judgment shall initiate that request, consistent with the individual rules of the assigned district judge, on or before February 15, 2013. This action is trial ready, subject to the foregoing requirements. A status conference will be held on October 9, 2013 at 11:00 a.m., by telephone . Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference call and have all parties on the line prior to connecting the court (631-712-5710). The call must be placed through the teleconference operator provided by your long-distance service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 1/15/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 15, 2013

Filing 45 ORDER re 43 Letter,, filed by County Of Suffolk, John Santacroce, Suffolk County Correctional Facility, Douglas Bassemir, County Attorney of Suffolk County, Victoria McCarrick, James Matthew, Suffolk County Sheriff's Office, Mic hael Hastings: Defendants' request to preserve the right to conduct a psychological examination of the plaintiff and to strike damages for emotional distress is denied on the ground that it is untimely. Discovery is certified as complete as o f December 31, 2012. A joint pre-trial order shall be filed, consistent with the individual rules of the assigned district judge, on or before March 4, 2013. Any party seeking leave to file a motion for summary judgment shall initiate that request, consistent with the individual rules of the assigned district judge, on or before February 15, 2013. This action is trial ready, subject to the foregoing requirements. A status conference will be held on October 9, 2013 at 11:00 a.m., by telephone . Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference call and have all parties on the line prior to connecting the court (631-712-5710). The call must be placed through the teleconference operator provided by your long-distance service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 1/15/2013. (Minerva, Deanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bottcher v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Office et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?