Gipson v. The Town of Hempstead et al
| 2:2009cv05466 |
| December 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to dismiss the second amended complaint is granted. Plaintiffs application for leave to further amend the complaint is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/26/2012. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice except as to Plaintiff's substantive due process claim, which is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has 30 days from the issuance of this order to file an amended complaint as to this claim or it will be dismissed with prejudice. Plff's other claims are dismissed. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/18/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gipson v. The Town of Hempstead et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
