American Automobile Insurance Company v. Security Income Planners & Co, LLC et al
Case Number: 2:2010cv00048
Filed: January 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 124 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 128 Motion for Summary Judgment. As set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants partia l summary judgment to Gross and Cerulli on the duty to defend issue, but denies summary judgment to Gross and Cerulli on the duty to indemnify issue. The Court grants SIPCOLLC's partial motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that AAIC is obligated to defend SIPCOLLC against the claims asserted by Gross and Cerulli, and awards SIPCOLLC attorneys' fees. The Court denies AAIC's cross-motion for summary judgment in its entirety. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/22/2012. (Weber, Rebecca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Automobile Insurance Company v. Security Income Planners & Co, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?